KEIR RADNEDGE REPORTS: The International Olympic Committee is standing firm on its prohibition of any sort of political or social gesture or demonstration within the Games venues in Tokyo in July and August.
The famous clenched-first protest by Tommie Smith and John Carlos during the medals ceremony in Mexico City in 1968 would thus remain banned and subject to disciplinary action.
A new set of dos and don’ts for Olympics competitors has been approved by the IOC executive board on the recommendation of its athletes’ commission after a report based on an in-depth survey of sportsmen and women worldwide concerning the strictures of Rule 50 of the Olympic Charter.
In the words of the IOC: “Rule 50 provides a framework to protect the neutrality of sport and the Olympic Games.”
Majorities of around 70pc supported the maintenance of an in-venue prohibition.
Kirsty Coventry, the former Olympic champion swimmer who chairs the athletes’ commission, said: “Being a retired athlete the podium and field of play and ceremonies hold specific memories in my heart and I wouldn’t have wanted something to distract and take away from that.
“The goal of this wide outreach was to engage with athletes on existing and new opportunities to express their views at the Olympic Games as well as outside Games time.
“We want to amplify the voices of athletes and find more ways to support the values of the Olympic Games and what sport stands for.”
The report concluded: The majority of participating athletes did not think it is appropriate for athletes to express individual views during the Opening Ceremony, on the podium nor on the field of play.
An IOC statement, explaining the survey project, said:
The recommendations are the result of an extensive qualitative and quantitative consultation process implemented by the IOC AC which started in June 2020 and involved over 3,500 athletes, representing 185 different National Olympic Committees (NOCs) and all 41 Olympic sports, and ensuring fully gender-equal representation.
The IOC and the IOC Athletes’ Commission are fully supportive of the freedom of expression.
This principle is included in the Athletes’ Rights and Responsibilities Declaration. Already in early 2020, the IOC AC had clarified the existing opportunities for athletes to express their views at the Olympic Games, such as during press conferences and interviews, at team meetings as well as on digital or traditional media.
1. Increase opportunities for athletes’ expression during the Olympic Games
a. At the opening and closing ceremonies
Highlight the importance of solidarity, unity and non-discrimination at the opening and closing ceremonies.
Adapt the Olympic Oath to include messaging on inclusion and non-discrimination.
Below is the proposal for changes to the Olympic Oath (which was approved by the IOC EB):
“In the name of the athletes”, “In the name of all judges” or “In the name of all the coaches and officials”.
“We promise to take part in these Olympic Games, respecting and abiding by the rules and in the spirit of fair play, inclusion and equality. Together we stand in solidarity and commit ourselves to sport without doping, without cheating, without any form of discrimination. We do this for the honour of our teams, in respect for the Fundamental Principles of Olympism, and to make the world a better place through sport.”
b. In the Olympic Village branding
Incorporate collective messaging into the Olympic Village “look” to celebrate Peace, Respect, Solidarity, Inclusion and Equality.
c. Through the Olympic Truce Mural
Context: The concept behind the design of the Olympic Truce Mural in the Olympic Village is “Frame of Peace”, recognising diversity, connecting people and bringing harmony. Athletes should be made more aware of this opportunity in the Olympic Village to express their support for these values.
Further leverage the Olympic Truce Mural in the Olympic Villages among the athletes for them to show their support for the Olympic Truce ideals and increase its reach through digital means of engagement.
d. Through athlete apparel
Produce athlete apparel with inclusive messaging and make it available for athletes and their entourage during the Games.
Proposed words are: Peace, Respect, Solidarity, Inclusion and Equality.
e. Social media campaign
Build on the “Stronger Together” campaign with the athlete community to increase awareness of our shared values of Peace, Respect, Solidarity, Inclusion and Equality.
f. Digital messaging in sports presentation
Incorporate messaging around our shared values as part of the digital messages in the competition venues and the sports presentation.
2. Increase athletes’ expression outside the Olympic Games
Context: As Olympic athletes, we are passionate about our sports. For each and every one of us, that passion continues into everyday life, where we advocate change on issues of great importance to us and our societies. Athletes should not be silent about the issues they care deeply about.
It should be noted that these causes vary for athletes from different parts of the world, backgrounds and cultures, and different issues are important to them.
The unique nature of the Games enables athletes from all over the world to come together in peace and harmony. By becoming Olympians, and through the platform that the Olympic Games provide, our visibility and reach within society is amplified beyond the 16 days of the Games. We believe that the example we set by competing with the world’s best, while living in harmony in the Olympic Village, is a uniquely positive message to send to an increasingly divided world.
Provide athletes with a platform, including Athlete365, to discuss and highlight topics that are important to them. The expression of views should always be respectful and in line with the Olympic values.
3. Preserve the podium, field of play (FoP) and official ceremonies
Context: In the quantitative study, a clear majority of athletes said that it is not appropriate to demonstrate or express their views on the field of play (70% of respondents), at official ceremonies (70% of respondents) or on the podium (67% of respondents).
This position was also widely expressed in the IOC AC qualitative consultation. The argument the IOC AC heard was the need to ensure that athletes and their special moments are respected, and that the focus of the Olympic Games remains on the celebration of the athletes’ performances, sport and the Olympic values. However, some athlete representatives took a different view, using freedom of expression and freedom of speech as their argument, and felt that this outweighed the other arguments.
The IOC AC took both views into account and consulted human rights and sports law experts. In these discussions it became clear that:
I. While freedom of speech and expression is a universally recognised fundamental human right, it is not absolute. Such a right comes with duties and responsibilities.
II. Freedom of speech and freedom of expression may be restricted under a very limited set of conditions, the assessment of which is delicate and varies depending on the circumstances (hence Recommendations 4, 5 and 6 below).
Listening to ACs as part of the qualitative consultation, the IOC AC is very concerned about the risk of politicisation of the athletes and the risk that athletes may be put under external pressure. It is important to protect athletes from the potential consequences of being placed in a position where they may be forced to take a public position on a particular domestic or international issue, regardless of their beliefs. In such cases, the political neutrality of the Olympic Games is a way to protect athletes from political interference or exploitation. (See the freedom of expression assessment section for details.)
In conclusion, the quantitative and qualitative findings indicate that the majority of athletes want to protect the field of play, official ceremonies and podium.
Preserve the podium, FoP and official ceremonies from any kind of protests and demonstrations, or any acts perceived as such.
4. Provide clarity on sanctions
As it is the current practice according to the IOC disciplinary procedures and IOC Rule 50 Guidelines, examine breaches of the current paragraph 2 of Rule 50 on a case-by-case basis to ensure due process and the proportionality of sanctions.
The IOC AC recommends that the Legal Affairs Commission clarify, in due course, the range of sanctions that would be imposed for a breach of the Rule, taking into consideration the respective context of each individual case.
5. Provide more information around Rule 50
Provide increased and enhanced information on:
The purpose and scope of Rule 50.2 (athlete expression) and the related Guidelines.
How the Olympic values and the non-discrimination principle are implemented and promoted by all stakeholders.
6. Restructure Rule 50 into two rules and increase clarity of Rule 50.2
Context: The combination of Rule 50.1 and Rule 50.2 in Rule 50 leads to a lack of clarity on the scope and purpose of Rule 50.
Separate Rule 50.1 and Rule 50.2 into two rules.
Provide more clarity on the scope of Rule 50.2, including by incorporating some elements that are currently included only in the Rule 50 Guidelines, into the Rule itself.
The conclusions presented today by the IOC AC will be taken into account from the Olympic Games Tokyo 2020 onwards. The proposed change of Rule 50 of the Olympic Charter will be addressed, taking the evaluation of the implementation at one edition of the Olympic Games (Tokyo 2020) and one edition of the Olympic Winter Games (Beijing 2022) into account.
The athlete consultation
Among the new possibilities that were proposed in the quantitative survey, the ones most likely to be deemed important to introduce were to hold a moment of solidarity against discrimination during the Opening Ceremony and to have unified messaging around inclusion and solidarity on the field of play. Additionally, the research revealed a clear result whereby unified messaging promoting the Olympic values and Olympic Truce was preferred over individual messaging about a specific cause.
The majority of participating athletes did not think it is appropriate for athletes to express individual views during the Opening Ceremony, on the podium nor on the field of play. The respondents were most likely to believe it appropriate for athletes to demonstrate or express their individual views in the media, in press conferences and in the mixed zones.